86* But, besides these evidences of Scripture, besides our own creed, which we say we have from the Apostles, there is the reasonableness of the thing. It is perfectly monstrous to 6uppose that there can be two true faiths. It cannot be : one of the two must be false. And will any man say, that we ought to applaud a measure which, of necessity, must produce an indefinite number of faiths ? If our eternal salvation depend upon our believing the truth, can it be good to place people in a state of necessity to have different beliefs ? And does not that which takes away the head of the Church inevitably produce such a state of necessity ? „ How is the faith of all nations to continue to be one, if there be in every nation a head of the Church, who is to be appealed to, in the last resort, as to all questions, as to all points of dispute, which may arise ? How, if this be the case, is there to be “ one fold and one shepherd ” ? How is there to be “one faith and one baptisia M ? How are the “ unity of the spirit and the bond of peace ” to be preserved ? We shall presently see what unity and what peace there were in England, the moment the King became the head of the Church.
https://archive.org/stream/AHistoryOfTheProtestantReformation/AHistoryOfTheProtestantReformation_djvu.txt
No comments:
Post a Comment