Six Revelations from NASA's Public Panel on UFOs Daily Mail

Senior Science Reporter Matthew Phelan has a useful recap of the May 31st televised session, with clips from some of the main speakers. Kevin Randle also has Thoughts on the NASA Panel and a Suggestion for Data Collection. "It was basically what I had expected," he said. "I sensed a coordination here" among the speakers, which we also noticed. Kevin's observations and Fran Ridge's MADAR network example illustrate why at least one bona fide ufologist should have been empaneled, along with the two scholars possessing SETI associations, on the high-quality study team. Tobias and Emily Wayland add NASA to Release UFO Report Later This Summer. As in "by the end of July." The Waylands also note study chair David Spergel's point the team's remit is "not to resolve the nature of these [UFO/UAP] events." Now to Avi Loeb on NASA, AARO and The Galileo Project Agree on the Need for a Scientific Study of UAP. Loeb explains why he cofounded The Galileo Project and updates us on its plans and funding. He also celebrates the headline's point that the three organizations are rejecting "past anecdotal reports from uncalibrated sensors" and "eyewitness testimonies or events that took place decades ago with compromised or classified quality." There now; don't we all feel better? (WM)

https://www.anomalist.com/